Asset performance, capex and owner–operator governance cadence—implemented through Bramnor Workspace, without replacing your existing tools. For hotel groups, REITs, and multi-site operators managing location-based portfolios.
We’ll share a short briefing pack first, then confirm next steps.
Asset-led portfolios split accountability across owners, operators, brands and vendors—creating inconsistent reporting, repeat debates, late escalations and capex decisions without clear thresholds. Bramnor fixes this with operating architecture: we define decision rights, KPI ownership, thresholds, pack structure and escalation routes, then implement it in Bramnor Workspace and run the cadence so it stays usable.
Performance stalls when ownership models and asset realities collide with governance. These are the tensions we help leadership teams resolve:
Decisions get re-litigated because rights, responsibilities and escalation routes are not explicit across parties.
Trade-offs between returns, guest/tenant experience and standards are discussed repeatedly without a shared decision frame.
Renovations, openings and repositionings drift when milestones, dependencies, thresholds and decision points aren’t governed.
Properties report differently; KPIs and definitions vary by region, brand or operator—so comparability fails.
Leadership forums slip under operational pressure, precisely when decisions need tighter control.
Operators and vendors affect outcomes without clear triggers, owners, and time-boxed escalation paths.
We implement a minimum viable operating system for portfolio performance and capex—so leadership time shifts from updates to decisions.
We implement a minimum viable operating system for portfolio performance and capex—so leadership time shifts from updates to decisions.
Briefing & fit
Confirm goals, constraints, stakeholders and the current governance cadence. Define scope boundaries and the first pack you want to improve.
Outputs
We start with a small core set — then expand based on scope, assurance needs and governance maturity.
Configured for enterprise teams (not self-serve).
A single KPI library with owners and threshold triggers that makes multi-site performance comparable and turns variance into decision-led exceptions.
Who it's for
A single, decision-led view of capex, renovations and openings—milestones, dependencies and exception triggers—so programmes stay on-sequence and capital discipline holds.
Clarity and control, not another dashboard. Your teams typically receive:
Occupancy/yield, profitability, asset health, capex progress and key risks are visible by asset—enabling like-for-like review.
Standard KPIs (e.g., occupancy/ADR/RevPAR signals, NOI/margin drivers, asset health) enable like-for-like review across sites, brands and regions.
Decision rights, thresholds and escalation routes are explicit—so trade-offs don’t recycle and issues land with the right owner and required inputs.
Renovations and openings are governed through milestones, dependencies and decision points—surfacing slippage early and forcing clear calls on scope and sequencing.
Asset health, compliance, service disruption and vendor dependency risks are tied to triggers, owners and “what happens next”—so issues move to closure.
No. Bramnor Workspace is an executive operating layer above existing systems. We use your current tools as sources where appropriate; we do not attempt to replace them.
Dashboards show information. We implement an operating system: decision rights, KPI ownership, thresholds, escalation routes, pack structure, and a cadence that converts data into decisions and closure.
Yes—at the operating layer. Properties remain different operationally, but they become comparable through consistent definitions, thresholds and pack structure.
Confirm asset scope, governance cadence, and where decisions stall (performance, capex, owner–operator handoffs).
Define the minimum operating architecture: KPI library, thresholds, decision rights, escalation routes, and pack format.
Who it's for
Clarify who recommends and who decides across ownership models, then log decisions with rationale and conditions so debates do not restart each cycle.
Who it's for
One governed view across assets, concepts and initiatives—so priorities, dependencies and capacity trade-offs translate into clear stop/start decisions and pack-ready cadence.
Who it's for
A trigger-led risk register that links portfolio and asset-health risks to owners, mitigation actions and escalation routes—kept visible in cadence and pack-ready each cycle.
Who it's for
Standardised Owner/Board and ExCo pack chapters and exports, generated from the same operating data so governance stays comparable, decision-led and low-rework each cycle.
Who it's for
Patterns vary by organization, starting conditions, scope and governance discipline.
Typically: COO/Operations, CFO/Finance, Head of Asset Management, Capex/PMO, and—where relevant—brand/operator counterparts. We map decision points explicitly so involvement is purposeful, not political.
Yes. The implementation is designed for split accountability. We make decision rights and escalation routes explicit across the parties, then run the cadence accordingly.
Configured modules, role-based permissions, and implementation support with your teams. This is not a self-serve sign-up product motion.
Most organisations see meaningful improvement once the first operating pack and decision/exception rules are implemented and run through a live cadence.
Configure Workspace views, logs and pack templates—then run the agreed monthly operating review and exception governance.
